{"id":48,"date":"2026-08-27T18:19:09","date_gmt":"2026-08-27T18:19:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/?p=48"},"modified":"2026-08-27T18:19:09","modified_gmt":"2026-08-27T18:19:09","slug":"how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/","title":{"rendered":"How to Perform SPT Testing: A Complete Field Procedure Guide"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>SPT testing drives a 2-inch split-spoon sampler 18 inches into the bottom of a borehole using a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. Mark the rod every 6 inches, count blows for each increment, and add the second and third counts. That sum is the N-value. The first 6 inches is seating and is never counted.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That is the whole test, and almost every part of it can be done wrong without anyone noticing. The N-value on a boring log looks like a measurement. It is really the output of a procedure &mdash; rod marking, hammer release, sampler condition, how you reached depth &mdash; and the procedure is where the error lives. A crew that seats the spoon in slough, or lets the rope drag on the cathead, hands the engineer a number that is 30 percent off and looks completely normal on the log.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">TMG Manufacturing builds the rigs that run this test and also manufactures the deep foundation products engineers design <em>from<\/em> those N-values &mdash; the hammers, tripods, split spoons and baskets, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/soil-ground-foundation-foundation-repair-underpinning-products\">helical piles<\/a> sized off the resulting log. We have no interest in making SPT sound more precise than it is.<\/p>\n\n\n<!-- PHOTO SLOT: STR-174 SPT\/coring rig (also used as the featured image)\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/drill-rigs\/spt-test-drill-rigs\/174\/str-174-featured.webp\n-->\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What the Standard Penetration Test Actually Measures<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The SPT measures the resistance of soil to being displaced by a driven, thick-walled tube. It is a disturbance test, not a strength test: no stress-strain curve, no undrained shear strength, no friction angle directly. Those come from correlations, and every correlation carries the scatter of the field procedure inside it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Governing standard: <strong>ASTM D1586\/D1586M-18e1<\/strong>, active as of August 2026, with a revision work item (WK99626) open in subcommittee D18.02. The energy input is a <strong>140 lb hammer<\/strong> falling <strong>30 in.<\/strong> The current edition lists 750 mm as the separate hard-metric drop value; older editions and the ISO family use 760 mm, which is why you see both numbers in the wild.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1240\" height=\"780\" src=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-01-drive-sequence.png\" alt=\"SPT drive sequence and N-value computation\" class=\"wp-image-47\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-01-drive-sequence.png 1240w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-01-drive-sequence-300x189.png 300w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-01-drive-sequence-1024x644.png 1024w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-01-drive-sequence-768x483.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1240px) 100vw, 1240px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 1. The 18-inch drive, the three 6-inch increments, and why the seating increment is discarded.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Anatomy of a Split-Spoon Sampler<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Head (or sub).<\/strong> Threads onto the drill rod. Holds the ball check valve and vent ports that let water and air escape as soil enters, and hold vacuum on withdrawal so the sample does not drop out.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Split barrel.<\/strong> Two half-cylinders clamped between head and shoe. Splitting them open is how the sample comes out intact.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Drive shoe.<\/strong> The hardened, tapered cutting end &mdash; the wear part, and the part that decides what actually gets sampled.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Per ASTM D1586 Figure 2, the sampler is <strong>2.00 in. OD (+0.05 \/ &minus;0.00)<\/strong> with a <strong>drive shoe ID of 1.375 in. &plusmn; 0.005 in.<\/strong> The split barrel&rsquo;s inside diameter may be <strong>either 1.50 in.<\/strong> &mdash; the &ldquo;upset wall&rdquo; configuration, barrel bore larger than the shoe &mdash; <strong>or 1.375 in.<\/strong>, a constant inside diameter. Both are permitted; the upset wall reduces sidewall friction on the sample and the constant ID does not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">That choice is not cosmetic. The standard itself notes <strong>N-values may differ by 10 to 30 percent between a constant-ID sampler and an upset-wall sampler.<\/strong> A 16-gauge liner in a 1.50 in. barrel is a second route to constant ID; liners are permitted, but note them on the penetration record. D1586 points to Practice D6066 for the correction &mdash; and D6066 was withdrawn in 2020, so the correction reference is a dead document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Barrel length is allowed to be <strong>18.0 to 30.0 in.<\/strong>, which is where the 18-inch versus 24-inch question comes from.<\/p>\n\n\n<!-- PHOTO SLOT: Lynac split spoon sampler; sampler baskets\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-products\/spt-samplers\/lynac-split-spoon-sampler-soil-test-geotech-products-spt.jpg\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-products\/spt-samplers-baskets\/trap-soil-baskets-spt-sampler-split-spoon-yellow-orange-red-sale.jpg\n-->\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1240\" height=\"800\" src=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-02-sampler-anatomy.png\" alt=\"Split-spoon sampler cutaway showing head, split barrel, and drive shoe\" class=\"wp-image-46\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-02-sampler-anatomy.png 1240w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-02-sampler-anatomy-300x194.png 300w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-02-sampler-anatomy-1024x661.png 1024w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-02-sampler-anatomy-768x495.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1240px) 100vw, 1240px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 2. Head, split barrel, and drive shoe, with the ASTM dimensions that define the test.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Field Procedure, Step by Step<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Advance the hole to test depth<\/strong> by one of the three methods below, and stop cleanly.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Clean the bottom of the hole.<\/strong> Anything left in the auger shoe gets driven ahead of the spoon.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Maintain hole stability.<\/strong> Keep water or drilling fluid at or above the groundwater table. Lost head lets the bottom heave, and heaved sand reads artificially low.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Inspect and assemble the sampler.<\/strong> Check the shoe for dents, out-of-round, or a curled lip. Replace it &mdash; do not hammer it back. A deformed shoe changes the effective ID and the N-value with it.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Lower the sampler to the bottom<\/strong> and set the weight of rods and hammer on it. If it sinks under its own weight, that is data &mdash; log it.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Mark the drill rod in three 6-inch increments<\/strong>, measured up from the actual seated position, not from a nominal depth. Tape, soapstone, or a carpenter&rsquo;s pencil against the rod, referenced to the drive head or rig table.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Drive with the 140 lb hammer falling 30 in.<\/strong> Rope and cathead: <strong>1&frac34; or 2&frac14; rope turns<\/strong>, cathead at a minimum of about <strong>100 rpm<\/strong>, rope clean and dry, drum free of rust and grease, and no restraining the rope at the top of the stroke.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Count and record blows separately for each 6-inch increment.<\/strong> Three numbers, always &mdash; 6\/8\/11, not just the sum.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Compute N as the second plus third increments.<\/strong> Above, N = 19. The first increment is the seating drive.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Stop driving if any of these occurs:<\/strong> 50 blows within any one 6-inch increment; 100 blows total; or 10 successive blows with no observed advance.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Record partial penetration properly.<\/strong> Fifty blows for 3 inches is logged <strong>50\/3&Prime;<\/strong> &mdash; never &ldquo;refusal&rdquo; with nothing behind it. The partial number is data; &ldquo;refusal&rdquo; is not.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Open the barrel and log the sample immediately<\/strong> &mdash; recovery length, stratigraphy, color, moisture, consistency or density, odor, and contacts within the sample. Describe per <strong>ASTM D2488-26<\/strong>; classify per <strong>ASTM D2487-17(2025)<\/strong> where lab data justify it.<\/li>\n\n\n<li><strong>Seal and label before it leaves the drill floor.<\/strong> Jars for classification, sealed sleeves for moisture retention. Project, boring, sample number, depth interval, blow counts, recovery.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Advance to the next test depth and repeat<\/strong> &mdash; typically 2.5 ft or 5 ft spacing, tightened at strata contacts and bearing elevations.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n<!-- PHOTO SLOT: Manual safety hammer; automatic hammer; SPT tripod (complete); tripod with hammer; tripod capstan\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-products\/spt-manual-hammers\/manual-safety-spt-hammer-sale-new-geotechnical-soil-testing.jpg\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-products\/spt-automatic-safety-hammer\/new-automatic-auto-spt-test-safety-hammer-soil-sampler.jpg\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-tripod\/manual-stp-soil-sampling-tripod-sale-new-lightweight-aluminum-low-cost.jpg\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-tripod\/standard-spt-tripod-soil-testing-geotech-sampling-legs.jpg\n     https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/img\/products\/geotechnical\/spt-tripod\/capstan-engine-tripod-soil-sampling.jpg\n-->\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">18-Inch vs. 24-Inch Split Spoons<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Both are legitimate tools; only one is running an ASTM test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">An <strong>18-inch spoon<\/strong> matches the D1586 drive interval exactly &mdash; three increments, N from the second and third, barrel full when the drive is done. Lighter, easier to open, less prone to sample compression.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A <strong>24-inch spoon<\/strong> is driven a full 24 inches in four increments. <strong>N is still increments two and three<\/strong>; the fourth is recorded and never counted. You gain sample volume &mdash; more for jars, more for classification testing, a better chance of catching a contact in one drive. What you should not do is call it an SPT per D1586: the standard defines a 1.5 ft drive interval and nothing else, so a 24-inch drive is practice convention, not an ASTM-defined test. Log it as a 24-inch sampling drive and you are being accurate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Three Ways to Get to Depth<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1240\" height=\"820\" src=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-03-routes-to-depth.png\" alt=\"Three routes to SPT test depth compared\" class=\"wp-image-45\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-03-routes-to-depth.png 1240w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-03-routes-to-depth-300x198.png 300w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-03-routes-to-depth-1024x677.png 1024w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-03-routes-to-depth-768x508.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1240px) 100vw, 1240px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 3. Hollow-stem auger, solid-flight auger, and continuous sampling compared at the sampling interval.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Hollow-stem auger.<\/strong> The flights double as temporary casing: drill to depth with a center or knock-out plug, pull the plug, sample through the hollow center. It is the default above the rock line in Florida and most of the Southeast, because the hole stays open in loose sand and you can sample below the water table without casing. Match auger ID, sampler OD, and rod OD deliberately &mdash; as trade practice, not a standards requirement, 3&frac14; in. and 4&frac14; in. ID augers are the common pairing with a 2 in. spoon. Reference practice is <strong>ASTM D6151-25<\/strong> (the older D6151\/D6151M-15 was withdrawn in 2024 and reinstated without the &ldquo;M&rdquo;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Solid-flight auger.<\/strong> No casing effect. Faster and cheaper in cohesive soils that stand open, fine above the water table. The hole must stay open unsupported while you pull augers, lower the spoon, and drive it. In clean sand below the water table it will not, and you are sampling collapse instead of soil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Continuous sampling, no drilling.<\/strong> Drive or push a continuous sampler and recover an unbroken column of soil &mdash; complete stratigraphy instead of an 18-inch sample every 5 ft, which is the difference between finding a 6-inch soft seam and never knowing it existed. Slower per foot, depth-limited, and in a driven configuration the blow counts are not SPT N-values. Use it where stratigraphy is the deliverable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Mud rotary is a fourth method and deserves its own article; <strong>ASTM D5783-18(2025)<\/strong>, which D1586 cross-references, remains active.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">The Part Nobody Tells You: Your Hammer, Not Your Soil, Sets the N-Value<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The SPT delivers a nominal 350 ft-lb per blow (140 lb &times; 30 in.). Only part of that reaches the sampler, and the part that does is not constant. The fraction is the energy transfer ratio (ETR).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1240\" height=\"780\" src=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-04-hammer-energy.png\" alt=\"Measured SPT hammer energy transfer and the N60 correction\" class=\"wp-image-44\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-04-hammer-energy.png 1240w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-04-hammer-energy-300x189.png 300w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-04-hammer-energy-1024x644.png 1024w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-04-hammer-energy-768x483.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1240px) 100vw, 1240px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 4. Measured ETR ranges from instrumented studies, and a worked N60 correction.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Instrumented studies &mdash; VTrans&rsquo;s hammer energy variability work and Auburn University&rsquo;s Highway Research Center calibrations among them &mdash; put measured ETR at roughly <strong>38 to 60 percent for donut hammers<\/strong>, <strong>35 to 72 percent for safety hammers<\/strong>, and <strong>49 to 96 percent for automatic hammers<\/strong>; Auburn&rsquo;s calibration of six automatic hammers for ALDOT averaged about 91 percent. The widely reproduced &ldquo;donut 45, safety 60, automatic 80&rdquo; table is not fabricated &mdash; those are rounded averages of measured data &mdash; but the distributions behind them are wide and heavily overlapping, and Auburn measured a coefficient of variation of 22 percent on a single manual donut hammer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The correction: <strong>N60 = N_field &times; (ETR \/ 60)<\/strong>. A field N of 20 from a hammer measured at 82 percent is an N60 of 27. Feed a correlation the raw 20 where 27 belongs and you are roughly 25 percent low on N &mdash; and because capacity correlations are not linear in N, the downstream error is not a simple percentage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Here is what catches people out. <strong>ASTM D1586 does not require energy calibration.<\/strong> Its scope says D4633 &ldquo;is generally necessary&rdquo; to measure drill rod energy &mdash; advisory language, no interval specified. And <strong>ASTM D4633 was itself withdrawn in February 2025 with no replacement<\/strong>, reinstatement work item open. The current SPT standard&rsquo;s energy reference points at a withdrawn document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Intervals come from agencies instead. NCDOT requires measurement <strong>every two years and after any major hammer repair<\/strong>; TxDOT and LADOTD require <strong>annual<\/strong> calibration, and LADOTD permits automatic hammers only. A specification silent on hammer energy is silent on the largest controllable source of error in the test.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Where SPT Does Not Work<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>Soft and sensitive clays.<\/strong> N near zero carries almost no information. Use thin-walled tube sampling, vane shear, or <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/cpt-vs-spt\/\">CPT<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Gravel, cobbles, and construction fill.<\/strong> A 2 in. spoon bearing on one stone gives a fake high N.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Continuous profiling.<\/strong> SPT is a discrete test. Thin layers need CPT or continuous sampling.<\/li>\n\n<li><strong>Tripod and hand-hammer setups.<\/strong> Genuinely useful for limited-access work, and <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/spt-tripod-soil-sampling-equiptment-spt-drop-hammer-aluminum-structure-spt-testing\">we sell them<\/a> &mdash; but D1586 &sect;1.7 frames the test around rotary drilling equipment and the standard does not address hand driving. Report tripod results as penetration resistance data with that qualification, not as D1586 N-values.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Standards Status: Check Your Boilerplate<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">As of August 2026, ASTM has withdrawn much of the field sampling suite that boring-log legends habitually cite &mdash; most out of subcommittee D18.02, with RQD going the same way out of D18.12:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-table alignwide\"><table class=\"has-fixed-layout\"><thead><tr><th>Standard<\/th><th>Subject<\/th><th>Status (Aug 2026)<\/th><\/tr><\/thead><tbody><tr><td>D1586\/D1586M-18e1<\/td><td>SPT and split-barrel sampling<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong> (revision work item WK99626 open)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D6151-25<\/td><td>Hollow-stem augers<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong> (reinstated; &ldquo;M&rdquo; dropped)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D5434-25<\/td><td>Field logging of subsurface explorations<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong> (reinstated)<\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D2488-26<\/td><td>Visual-manual description<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D2487-17(2025)<\/td><td>USCS classification<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D5783-18(2025)<\/td><td>Direct rotary, water-based fluid<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D6286\/D6286M-20<\/td><td>Selection of drilling and direct push methods<\/td><td><strong>Active<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D1587\/D1587M-15<\/td><td>Thin-walled tube sampling<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2024<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D2113-14<\/td><td>Rock core drilling<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2023<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D4220\/D4220M-14<\/td><td>Preserving and transporting soil samples<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2023<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D4633-16<\/td><td>Energy measurement for dynamic penetrometers<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2025<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D6066-11<\/td><td>Normalized penetration resistance of sands<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2020<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><tr><td>D6032\/D6032M-17<\/td><td>Rock quality designation (RQD)<\/td><td><strong>Withdrawn 2026<\/strong><\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A withdrawn standard is not a wrong method &mdash; it is a document ASTM no longer maintains. But writing &ldquo;sampling per ASTM D1587, core per D2113, energy per D4633&rdquo; into a 2026 specification means contractually referencing documents that are no longer current standards. Update the boilerplate, or name the method and edition explicitly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Common Mistakes That Ruin N-Values<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>Marking the rod from a nominal depth instead of the actual seated position.<\/li>\n\n<li>Reporting only the sum instead of all three increment counts.<\/li>\n\n<li>Logging &ldquo;REF&rdquo; instead of the partial penetration (write 50\/3&Prime;).<\/li>\n\n<li>Sampling into slough, or running a dented drive shoe for a whole boring.<\/li>\n\n<li>Mixing upset-wall, constant-ID, and lined spoons in one project without noting it.<\/li>\n\n<li>Comparing N-values across rigs with different hammers and no energy data.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image alignwide size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1240\" height=\"720\" src=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-05-failure-modes.png\" alt=\"Four SPT field errors that produce a wrong N-value\" class=\"wp-image-43\" srcset=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-05-failure-modes.png 1240w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-05-failure-modes-300x174.png 300w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-05-failure-modes-1024x595.png 1024w, https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/FIG-spt-05-failure-modes-768x446.png 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1240px) 100vw, 1240px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Figure 5. Slough, lost head, gravel on the shoe, and cathead wraps &mdash; and which way each biases N.<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What This Actually Costs You Downstream<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Pile capacity, settlement, liquefaction triage, shallow footings or deep foundations &mdash; all of it correlated from N. We size <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/soil-ground-foundation-foundation-repair-underpinning-products\">helical piles and underpinning products<\/a> off boring logs every week, and the logs that cause problems are never the ones with bad-looking numbers. They are the ones with clean-looking numbers produced by a procedure nobody documented. Record the increments, the hammer, and how you reached depth, and the engineer can work with whatever the soil gave you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><strong>Need SPT equipment or a rig that runs the test properly?<\/strong> TMG Manufacturing builds <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/spt-test-drill-rigs\">SPT and coring rigs<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/geotechnical-spt-products-sale-soil-samplers-manual-auto-hammers-anvil-baskets-split-spoon-safety\">automatic and manual safety hammers, split-spoon samplers, and sampler baskets<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/spt-tripod-soil-sampling-equiptment-spt-drop-hammer-aluminum-structure-spt-testing\">tripods and capstans<\/a> &mdash; and we repair hydraulic drill rigs regardless of who built them. Call <strong>(813) 464-2299<\/strong> or toll-free <strong>1-888-508-RIGS<\/strong>, or email <strong>info@tmgmfg.com<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Ramzy Moumneh, TMG Manufacturing<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is a good N-value in SPT testing?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It depends on soil type and what you are building. Terzaghi and Peck&rsquo;s ranges for sands: below 4 very loose, 4 to 10 loose, 10 to 30 medium dense, 30 to 50 dense, above 50 very dense. In clays, below 4 is soft and above 30 is hard. Correct field N to N60 before applying any published correlation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Why is the first 6 inches of an SPT not counted?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The bottom of a borehole is disturbed by drilling, and the first 6 inches pushes the sampler through that disturbed zone &mdash; the seating drive. Counting it would mix drilling disturbance into a soil measurement, so D1586 discards it and defines N over the 0.5 to 1.5 ft portion of the drive.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">How deep should SPT borings go?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Deep enough that the added stress from the foundation is negligible. The ASCE (1972) rule takes the shallower of two depths: where added vertical stress falls below about 10 percent of the applied pressure, and where it falls below 5 percent of the effective overburden stress. For deep foundations, extend well below the anticipated tip. The registered design professional sets the depth, not the driller.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">What is the difference between N and N60?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">N is the raw field blow count. N60 adjusts it to a drill rod energy transfer ratio of 60 percent of the theoretical 350 ft-lb: N60 = N &times; (ETR \/ 60). Because measured ETR runs from roughly 35 percent on a tired manual hammer to over 90 percent on a modern automatic, the two can differ by more than 30 percent on the same soil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Can you perform SPT without a drill rig?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">You can drive a split spoon with a tripod, a capstan, and a manual safety hammer, and it is useful for limited-access, interior, and remote work. What you cannot do is call the result an ASTM D1586 N-value &mdash; the standard frames the test around rotary drilling equipment and does not address hand driving. Report the data with that qualification.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SPT testing drives a 2-inch split-spoon sampler 18 inches into the bottom of a borehole with a 140-pound hammer falling 30 inches. The N-value is the sum of the second and third 6-inch increments \u2014 and the procedure, not the soil, is where the error lives.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":17,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-spt-testing"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"TMG Manufacturing Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"510\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"510\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/webp\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"ramzy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"ramzy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"ramzy\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7c77ceb7dc1f3f5d9b3f314654c5edf1\"},\"headline\":\"How to Perform SPT Testing: A Complete Field Procedure Guide\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":2558,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp\",\"articleSection\":[\"SPT Testing\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/\",\"name\":\"How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00\",\"description\":\"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp\",\"width\":510,\"height\":510,\"caption\":\"TMG STR-174 drill rig configured for SPT sampling and wireline core drilling\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to Perform SPT Testing: A Complete Field Procedure Guide\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"TMG Manufacturing Blog\",\"description\":\"Drilling rigs, geotechnical products &amp; foundation repair insights from Tampa, FL\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"TMG Manufacturing Blog\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-logo.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2026\\\/08\\\/tmg-logo.png\",\"width\":572,\"height\":162,\"caption\":\"TMG Manufacturing Blog\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/7c77ceb7dc1f3f5d9b3f314654c5edf1\",\"name\":\"ramzy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"ramzy\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/tmgmfg.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/ramzy\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG","description":"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG","og_description":"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.","og_url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/","og_site_name":"TMG Manufacturing Blog","article_published_time":"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00","og_image":[{"width":510,"height":510,"url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp","type":"image\/webp"}],"author":"ramzy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"ramzy","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/"},"author":{"name":"ramzy","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7c77ceb7dc1f3f5d9b3f314654c5edf1"},"headline":"How to Perform SPT Testing: A Complete Field Procedure Guide","datePublished":"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/"},"wordCount":2558,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp","articleSection":["SPT Testing"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/","url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/","name":"How to Perform SPT Testing: Complete Field Procedure Guide | TMG","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp","datePublished":"2026-08-27T18:19:09+00:00","description":"A complete SPT testing procedure guide \u2014 rod marking, blow counts, split-spoon anatomy, refusal criteria, hammer energy, and how to reach test depth.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-str-174-spt-coring-drill-rig.webp","width":510,"height":510,"caption":"TMG STR-174 drill rig configured for SPT sampling and wireline core drilling"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/how-to-perform-spt-testing-field-procedure-guide\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to Perform SPT Testing: A Complete Field Procedure Guide"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/","name":"TMG Manufacturing Blog","description":"Drilling rigs, geotechnical products &amp; foundation repair insights from Tampa, FL","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#organization","name":"TMG Manufacturing Blog","url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-logo.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/tmg-logo.png","width":572,"height":162,"caption":"TMG Manufacturing Blog"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/7c77ceb7dc1f3f5d9b3f314654c5edf1","name":"ramzy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/54269d407cb3bf307b888ccbfeaccd943807a989515c083a038285edba359f0f?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"ramzy"},"url":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/author\/ramzy\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48\/revisions\/49"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/17"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tmgmfg.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}